Search for: "MILLER v. MILITARY" Results 1 - 20 of 369
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2010, 6:29 am by Dwight Sullivan
This week at the Supremes:  Tomorrow’s order list will almost certainly include the denial of cert in the military case of Miller v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 2:55 pm by Lawrence Solum
Here is the abstract:This Article discusses the case of Al-Marri v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 10:00 am by Yishai Schwartz
When last we left Lawfare readers, the prosecution in the United States v. al-Nashiri military commission had begun “preadmission” of evidence despite the ongoing refusal of defense counsel to participate. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 8:04 am by Zachary Spilman
UNITED STATES, AND THIS COURT’S RECENT OPINIONS IN MEDINA, MILLER, AND JONES. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 8:21 am
Professor Colin Miller has a comment today on his blog about United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 8:21 am
Professor Colin Miller has a comment today on his blog about United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 6:30 am
Benefits available to State employees and employees of a political subdivision of the State ordered to military service §§242 and 243 of New York State’s Military Law Ronald Miller, Esq., in an item posted in CCH’s Blog Employment Law Daily,* reports that a “city was denied summary judgment against an employee’s claim that it refused to reemploy her as a building custodian following her return from active duty with the National Guard… [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 2:33 pm by Dwight Sullivan
MILLER, 67 M.J. 385 (C.A.A.F. 2009), BUT SEE UNITED STATES v. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 4:00 am by Sarah Grant
Military commission proceedings in United States v. al-Nashiri continued Nov. 7 with military judge Col. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 7:27 am by Zachary Spilman
United States, and this Court’s recent opinions in Medina, Miller, and Jones. [read post]
28 Dec 2008, 6:29 am
Miller, No. 08-0580/AR (granted 9 Oct); United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2018, 2:52 pm by The Law Office of Philip D. Cave
We all know that military defense counsel is required to advise a client of potential sex offender registration issues since United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 6:58 am by Yishai Schwartz
Following the events of Nov. 13 summarized in the last post in this series, the military commission in United States v. al-Nashiri reconvened on Tuesday, Nov. 14 to continue testimony and the “preadmission” of evidence relating to physical evidence from the site of the attack on the USS Cole, identified as Appellate Exhibit 207. [read post]